Hello, friends! Those who still remembers the days when all around was good, because No one knew that it is better, I understand. The Soviet Union used the excellent people management practices. The man begins to understand what can be better only when he learns that it is possible. Suffered if someone without gum, when he did not know that it happens whether or not Coca-Cola. Family ate corn flakes and washed down with duchesse or tarragon.
Everyone wanted to buy a Lada because options others were not. Some teams networkers today continue to keep their partners for the same iron curtain. Write this article I pushed a comment one of my readers – Michael, the article "All move to the Internet, are you? ", in which Dmitri Smakotin talked about held his team vebinarah. I have encountered in practice with the ideology of MLM structures on which the sponsorship line – the only answer to all questions (Read CPSU). Talk about business with people from the parallel structures are not welcome, but from other companies as general anti-Soviet propaganda. The aim is clear, we can not show their partners a place where it is better – to be tempted to go there.
The ideology of working, lasted 70 years, but still the test of time has not passed. You can be for their partners just a sponsor, promoting 'the world's best MLM company' and fencing of all that does not work or can hurt your business. Or you can be for them to mentor through life, helping to develop in all directions, not just where it brings you money to transfer all their knowledge and expertise to help find other people who care primarily about the partner. What to choose – it's up to you. In the first case will always have to be afraid that your partner will find a warm place and to emigrate there to prevent this from happening, get yourself to person with whom they want to work. Develop your skills and share them with others. The value of the sponsor is not in that select not from anyone, and that it really helps. When you give people looking to you to mentor all of its knowledge and skills, not just those deemed necessary for its own benefit, then you will have a team of like-minded people, not faceless structure. Often remember the obligations that you undertake, from working with a new partner – to help him succeed, "not" help him to create for me a source of income. " PS: Leave your opinion on my blog – Post opinion Good luck, Dmitry Zhilin. Coach of financial success.
In September 2008 I went to a witch named Moran for help in love magic, the fact that I suffered from unrequited love, my girlfriend left me on the 4th meeting of the year, has found a better, richer, younger, which it conquered in first meeting. To any persuasion was not my favorite, with me not even want to talk on the phone! Month I did not leave the house, lost his job and friends that I was at that time was considered a complete idiot, running for a traitor. After an unsuccessful attempt to commit suicide, I have decided that you need to take drastic measures, by the time I was searching for the magical sites at one site a magician, I will not name him, I was mildly cheated, took the money and out of sight. Once I cheated this man, I realized that fate turned its back on me, I decided that I really is not worth living, and was about to repeat his attempt to withdraw from life. But quite by accident just across the day a friend hinted that he wants to go to a school of magic 'Midgard' to the witch Moran on distance learning, advised me to it. Few porassprashivav her who she was a witch Moran is doing, I realized that a try Last chance fell to me. I immediately wrote a letter to her, she answered quickly within 12 hours, the answer I was pleasantly pleased, she promised to help me that would be my favorite with me, but I needed to abide by its rules. .
Today will begin with a definition of language as a place of contradiction and dialectics of appropriation of language exchange, with the aim of scoring very well, as input to the game, the complete change of perspective that we need to operate talking about what they I said when I tried to answer the question "What is thinking?". We, in fact, an analysis of what, in the language relieves certain cognitive processes (fully implicit) that we have studied to what, in it, entirely relieved of sociology, ie the permanent contradiction (and fully implicit) the divergence and convergence (which by bad luck you know very well) constitute the person. And therefore, the anthropology of Jean Gagnepain proved that the two plans of rationality (rationality and social rationality verbal) were clinically completely autonomous. I will begin to illustrate this dialectical opposition, given the existence of languages. Remember: Why, they said, all the dolphins of the world speak the "delfiniano" if we can not say that all men speak the "antroninano? Simply because the dolphins, like other animals, seek to "communicate" with them, however what characterizes man is precisely the rejection of what we call everyday language … "communication"! You need to understand, in fact, that no man from the moment that this says to another: "I'm not you", that is, you know, we started to make a hole for ourselves and bear with our neighbor, hole that we really need, then fill in, on pain of being doomed to idiocy, in the etymological sense of the term (the fools in ancient Greek, are those who become locked in its singularity).