" A countable system for a farming company will have scent to field. Jeff Sessions addresses the importance of the matter here. The design of a system security and hygiene for a mining company will not be able to become lost in thought of the side of confinement and tragedy persecutes that it atavically. The design of image of or divided politician will not be able to stop making reference to the promise and the design of acoustic system for a church will have to consider that pronounces the voice of Dios" there; Leonardo Schvarstein. They summarize the management cannot neglect the design of the organizations, especially at this time that is characterized by very turbulent scenes and where one of the characteristics important to consider themselves in the organizations of the 21st century is the flexibility, the adaptation to the change without it originates a threat for the company. Schvarstein comments to us, that all design has one purpose, persecutes an intention, but that not always is considered, in addition that all design of organizations passes within the framework of interactions between people, who as well they take place within ampler context. The design without characterizing this context of meaning cannot be undertaken nor be included/understood, since it is there where the meaning resides and not in the design in himself. For the meaning and the resolution of the design and its object, the effective type of organization and its intentions concur as well as values in her. The design has, then, teleological and axiolgicas determinants. In this brief article it is tried to remember those excellent aspects to consider itself in the design and its endorsement is the contribution that on this topic has provided us Leonardo Schvarstein (Design of the Organizations: tension and paradoxes. Paidos1998) Majorities, basic annotations comments to us that when it has been decided to realise a design of organizations they must consider aspects such as: The intentions that not always orient a design can specify clearly, is for political, technical reasons or simply because it is not clear.