Russian Business

'In the current SRO SRO in the building and enter into the design will not: expensive and nasty', 'they are ruining small businesses have created hundreds of new pyramids do unemployed surviving in small business specialists and professionals in various industries ',' what a chimera was created in the construction industry? ',' nothing is changing, CPO raised a wave of protests. You can understand when you have something taken away in the name of a great goal. And it turns out that all been started a few because of additional interest income. It's sad. " It is published on the blog of the RF President the views of business, which are usually quite restrained and philosophical innovations relate to all the Russian authorities. Explosion outrage followed from the construction sector, not the first, which affected self-regulation.

SRO has already created a court-appointed trustees, auditors, appraisers, advertisers, and other professionals of the business. Work something to do without scandals and disturbances, and that's in the building had to restore order. After all, the idea itself was just wonderful. SRO in the building were intended to replace the government and boost process formation of civil society. The state freed from the oppression of an entire industry and strict control, the license, which caused violent protests have been from January 1 this year, resolutely abolished.

Now, the business sector itself sets the rules, decides who can be trusted to work, and who does not. Is not this idyllic dream every director of construction firm? Apparently not. The number of opponents and supporters of innovation are at odds year already, and now, when it became clear that there is no backstop, passions only intensified. It is heated so that the SRO in the construction of SRO in the design and prospectors, not 'first signs' of this reform, the latter also did not remain. On line credit cooperatives, insurance companies, fire, carriers, teheksperty in road safety, as well as, perhaps, the doctors. At the same time representatives of the SROs in the construction, SRO in the design and the authorities are confident that all problems are temporary, moreover, they are exaggerated and eventually disappear. 'Many dire predictions that in the beginning of 2010 will be the collapse of the industry have not been confirmed in principle, that, in general, gives reason to continue such forecasts do not trust '- the general director of Russian Union of Builders, Mikhail Viktorov. Head of the Department of Economic Development Andrei Sharov also calms flushed head, saying 'do not hurry, it takes time for everything. " And if you give trade unions a chance, they would soon show themselves to advantage, and disadvantages of legislation the authorities promise to correct, so to speak, on the job. That's just not on top of these mantras are very helpful to builders, who believe the cost of joining the SRO in the building, facing new demands to their companies or waiting for approvals over allotted by the law of the month.

SRO Organization

Membership in the SRO may be terminated in the following cases: 1) voluntary withdrawal of the CPO in the building, 2) exclusion of members of the SRO, and 3) the death of an individual entrepreneur or legal entity's liquidation – a member of the SRO in construction. In the voluntary membership of the SRO in the construction stops on an application filed by a member of the self-regulatory organization in its authorized body. To terminate the membership is not required SRO decision, although it was in the law does not explicitly stated. Reducing the number of members of the SRO in the building due to voluntary withdrawal of any of its members may threaten the status of self-regulatory organization, and ultimately affect the interests of all members of the SRO in the building. Nonetheless, membership in the SRO in the building is voluntary, and no person shall be compelled to remain a member of the SRO, if that does not want. Termination of membership the person SRO in the building on whatever grounds, with the exception of the death of the individual entrepreneur and the legal person shall not relieve the former member of the self-regulatory organization of financial and other obligations to her, such as the payment of arrears of membership dues and contributions to the compensation fund, damages, if there had been causing them, etc. Similarly, the termination of membership in the face of SRO in the building do not self-regulatory organization exempt from vicarious liability if it turns out that her former member injured because of poorly implemented and works at the production of such work the person was member of the SRO in the building and was granted admission to the SRO in this work. With membership in the SRO in the construction of the candidate does not have to prove that it meets the requirements of standards and regulations and self-regulatory organization pay established for the candidates to the SRO in the construction fees. So even if the rules of self-regulation is established that members of the SRO must have a certified quality management system and insurance civic responsibility, the fulfillment of these requirements a candidate SRO can check only once during the pilot test, but not when taking a person into the self-regulating organization.