Later Pablo

The proper Church Catholic (the others also) seaproveitou of made velvety or permissive environments where the subject geralmente led to die, to hide culprits or to even prorogue mandates, trusting noesquecimento and the depravation of the time. Recently until a cardinal ligadoao Pope arrived to make a declaration at least influenced by the fear clericalde to lose the financial control of the Church, being preferred to keep this all the cost, what serious cause queerness, a time that, in the deep one, is an exchange of santidadepelo money. It doubly errou when saying that ' ' the celibacy does not have relaocom the sexual abuses of minors cometidospor padres' '. It will be? Errou doubly because the Church if says established nBblia, and this points the marriage (ally to the allegiance) as one of the forms dese to prevent depravation/promiscuity of the world. The New Will arrives dizerque ' ' honored either the marriage and bendito of all either the stream bed without mcula' ' (Hb13,4), meaning the bed where the spouses make love and procreate.

Apstolofaz two declarations in this direction that speak for itself. A time it said that ' ' obispo all man either husband of one only mulher' ' (I Tm 3,2) to give bomtestemunho to the community for which candle spiritual. If this valley for osleigos, what not to say for the clergy? Later Pablo it arrives to say that fundamental that the married couple if does not unglue one alone time one of the other, for (they see well) not suffering temptations from extramarital sex (I Co 7,5). Istobasta. Therefore, if common men suffer daily temptations, exactly in environments ' ' puros' ' how of old, what not to say of the ambienteserotizados ones of After-modernity? if I or you is attemped, without sermosclero, why devils the tempting one would not launch bigger temptations still for oclero? Who is the proper clergy recognizes that, as well as Jesus he was very maisalvo of the seductions of the hell, the priests obviously it will be that osleigos (the majority already do not deliver of body and soul ' ' to the delights of carne' '). With effect, the declarations of the Cardinal Walter Casper (and the Vatican, for extension) are completely baseless and frivolous, and put aprpria at risk Church, if it is that for the S Saint the risks dangerous somenos spirituals of what the financiers! A world of depraved priests has to queser and will be always very worse of what a world WITHOUT church! (by the way, without a igrejapapal): this would have to be clerical consensus. Finally, the arguments in favor of celibatoOBRIGATRIO if melt as butter to the fire when we remember in them demaisigrejas Christian, including the Anglicana and others even of confession catholic, emque the priests can marry normally. still is in air terrible estranhezaque if it would translate thus: if Rome knows that the obligator celibacy puts a fardomuito heavy on the back of the priests (some of them in the flower of the age and formosos, as the priest Fbio de Melo) and leaves a devilish breach for the temptation dapromiscuidade, what after all it would be for backwards of this lapsed and atbiblicamente questionable norm? Forgot itself Rome that the first Pope (They are Peter, according to it) was married? Why soon Peter can and the others not? Prof. Brave Joo of Miranda.)